Swaziland: 'One month to AGOA review cycle'

Swaziland: 'One month to AGOA review cycle'
Published date:
Sunday, 01 May 2016
Author:
MLONDI MPANZA

Swaziland has one month to work on the remaining AGOA benchmarks as this year’s AGOA review cycle will begin in June until September.

AGOA is the African Growth and Opportunity Act, a United States Trade Act enacted on May 18, 2000 as Public Law 106 of the 200th Congress. 

The legislation significantly enhances market access to the US for qualifying Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries.

While working on the remaining benchmarks, which are amendments to the Public Order Act and Suppression of Terrorism Act which are currently being debated in parliament; the country has support from the United States of America Ambassador to Swaziland Lisa Peterson who pledged to “help Swaziland meet the AGOA benchmark” when she arrived in the country in January. 

She had further revealed that she was looking forward to working with the government and people of Swaziland and work in partnership with government. The time frame was revealed by the US Embassy Public Affairs Officer Ruth Newman who stated that Swaziland had only met two and a half of the five set benchmarks in order to reclaim eligibility to AGOA.

“This year’s normal review cycle for all countries in Africa will begin in June and conclude around September,” she said. She pointed out the possibility of an out of cycle review in the event the country met the benchmarks later in the year.

She said it was not at their discretion to asses and determine the country’s eligibility back to AGOA as that was the responsibility of multiple agencies in Washington. She said, “Once all five of the benchmarks are determined to have been met, the embassy would convey this information to our headquarters in Washington.  

Multiple agencies in Washington, not only the Department of State, would assess Swaziland’s progress on the benchmarks and make a determination of eligibility to participate in the preferential trade program under AGOA.” Worth mentioning is that the loss of the AGOA eligibility status resulted to the loss of thousands of jobs, mainly in the textile industry as they could no longer have market access to the US with qualifying Sub-Saharan African countries.

Half of five AGOA conditions met so far - US  

Despite the efforts being made by the country to conform to the five benchmarks set for admission back to the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), the United States Embassy has said they were considering that only two and a half of the five benchmarks had been met so far.

This was said by the United States of America Embassy Public Affairs Officer Ruth Newman. She, this past week, revealed that they had been closely following government’s efforts to work towards meeting the five AGOA benchmarks.

But she said only two and a half of the benchmarks had been met at the moment.

“At this point we consider that two and a half of the benchmarks have been met,” said Newman.  

It is now exactly 17 months since the country lost its eligibility to AGOA on January 1, 2015. US President Barack Obama withdrew the country’s eligibility because of failure to fully meet these benchmarks.

Newman said two of the benchmarks were the amendments to the Industrial Relations Act to allow for the registration of federations and to conform to International Labour Organisation (ILO) Convention No. 87 on the civil and criminal liability of trade union leaders.

She said although these were completed in 2014, the actual registration of federations did not take place until 2015.

The concern with the Industrial Relations Act was that it did not provide for the registration of labour federations and therefore, amendments had to be passed fully to allow for labour unions to work collectively in order to improve workers’ rights.

It was also pointed out that there was a need to amend Sections 40 and 97 of the Industrial Relations Act.

This was because civil and criminal liabilities caused concern since they sought to punish labour leaders for the actions of people affiliated to their unions.

This was said to be a violation of international law to hold people accountable for actions they themselves did not commit. 

Rather, it was highlighted that there were many models of acceptable languages to control security threats, but these pieces of legislations in their current form were overly broad. 

Moreover, Newman said they were still evaluating the third benchmark, which is the establishment of a Code of Good Practice for Industrial and Protest Action (the Code), as published in Legal Notice No. 202 of 2015 on December 1, 2015. 

She said the publication and dissemination of the Code was an important first step, but it remained to be seen how the Code was being implemented by the police, thus explaining the ‘half’.  

Newman also said, “We will continue to observe this until it is clear that the police have been properly trained and are using the Code to legally regulate protest actions and correctly investigate any allegations or incidents of abuse.”

Finally, the last two benchmarks are the amendments to the Public Order Act and Suppression of Terrorism Act.   

Prior, the Public Order Act was supposed to be brought in line with the ILO standards, while the Suppression of Terrorism Act was expected to narrow the scope of the definition of ‘terrorist act,’ bringing it in line with international practice. 

In light of these two, Newman said it was critical to see in the final versions of the documents that will emerge from Parliament that, “the freedoms of association, assembly and expression are being upheld in accordance with international norms.” 

This will be after the two Acts are tabled in Parliaments, where they were currently being considered. It is worth noting that it has previously been said that these two Acts were of concern in the sense that it remained a wonder whether or not citizens and workers would be allowed to have peaceful public gatherings without interference by the police even if federations were registered. This was particularly because the amendments of the two were said to allow for a processes of transparency and objectivity in deciding how people can come together for public gatherings. 

This was because at the time of the concerns were communicated; the law was interpreted as saying any public gathering could be stopped, as it has happened in the past. 

Hence, such interpretations were said to negatively impact the rights of labour unions and members of the public to gather to hold May Day celebrations and other meetings to talk about conditions of employment and other issues which affect the economy broadly.

Share this article

View related news articles

Swaziland: Is 2018 the year for its textile workers?

Can the year 2018 be a turning point for textile workers’ prolonged poverty? The workers in the textile industry said as they got into the new year and edged closer to this year’s negotiations which are scheduled to start next Wednesday, they would be demanding that government should adhere to TUCOSWA’s call for a basic minimum wage, which would see them as part of the least paid workforce, getting at least E3 000 per month. This means...

25 January 2018

Swaziland: "We should learn from AGOA loss"

Two years ago, I wrote on this very column how disappointing government was in the handling of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) issue.  I remember vividly describing it as a catastrophe so dreadful to be likened to Tsunami proportions. Last week, United States (US) President Donald Trump gave a green light to the restoration of the country’s eligibility for AGOA, which in all honesty is massive relieve for the country and...

31 December 2017

US restores trade benefits to Gambia, Swaziland

U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday restored trade benefits to Gambia and Swaziland under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), the U.S. Trade Representative’s Office said. [See text of Proclamation here] The AGOA trade program provides sub-Saharan countries duty-free access to the United States on condition they meet certain statutory eligibility requirements, including eliminating barriers to U.S. trade and investment and...

23 December 2017

Presidential Proclamation to take certain actions under the AGOA and for other purposes

In Proclamation 9223 of December 23, 2014, President Obama determined that the Republic of The Gambia (“The Gambia”) was not making continual progress in meeting the requirements described in section 506A(a)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (the “Trade Act”) (19 U.S.C. 2466a(a)), as added by section 111(a) of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (the “AGOA”). Thus, pursuant to section 506A(a)(3) of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C....

23 December 2017

Eligibility reviews: Press statement in support of Swaziland’s eligibility status for AGOA

The Amalgamated Trade Union of Swaziland (ATUSWA) representing 9 000 workers in the textile and apparel industry, the Trade Union Congress of Swaziland (TUCOSWA) representing 40 000 workers and 16 affiliated unions, and the IndustriALL Global Union representing 50 million workers in 140 countries met in Manzini, Swaziland on the 29th of August 2017 to discuss the status of the United States Trade Act – the African Growth and Opportunity Act...

04 September 2017

Swazi king signs public order, terrorism amendment bills

His Majesty King Mswati III has given assent to the Public Order Bill and the Suppression of Terrorism amendment Act. The King endorsed the two Acts last week Tuesday. This comes as good news as this means that Swaziland is a step closer to regaining its African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) status. Swaziland was removed from AGOA in January 2015.  

15 August 2017

US urges Swaziland to review terrorism law as precondition for AGOA readmission

The United States has asked Swaziland to redefine ‘Terrorism Act’ before it could be reconsidered for the African Growth Opportunity Agreement (AGOA). This was stated by Prime Minister Banarbas Dlamini when giving feedback to Senate Portfolio Committee in Parliament during the debate of the Suppression of Terrorism Amendment Bill No. 10 of 2010 on Wednesday. The premier said during the discussion of the bill with the Americans and the...

05 July 2017

Swaziland to fulfill ILO benchmarks in June – sources

Swaziland may regain its African Growth and Opportunity (AGOA) status as it promises to meet all five benchmarks set by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) by June, APA reports on Tuesday. As of now Swaziland met three and the remaining two are the amendment of the Suppression of Terrorism Act and the amendment of the Public Order Act which should allow for the full recognition of the freedom of assembly, speech and organisation. The...

12 February 2016

New US Ambassador: I will help Swaziland regain AGOA

Incoming Unites States of America Ambassador to Swaziland Lisa Peterson carries hope for the country’s re-admission to the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) – a duty-free trade agreement that enhances market access to the US for qualifying Sub-Saharan African countries. Swaziland lost its AGOA status on January 1, 2015 after US President Barack Obama withdrew the kingdom’s eligibility because of failure to fully meet five...

17 January 2016

Swaziland: 'US chicken dumping to threaten local producers'

The Swaziland poultry industry will soon face a challenge to compete with United States (US) unfairly low chicken prices after South Africa allowed American poultry in their market. Minister of Agriculture Moses Vilakati said this would be a huge challenge to Swazi producers, adding that it was beyond any doubt that US chickens would soon hit the shelves of local retailers, especially through the Republic chain supermarkets like Pick n Pay...

15 January 2016