TRALAC - Trade Law Centre

How the ECOWAS-EU EPA could affect AGOA

Friday, 14 February 2014 Published: | Dennis Matanda and Stephen Lande

Source: Manchester Trade (USA)

In what could be a 'breakthrough' for both the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the European Union (EU), the EU announced that "the two entities reached a deal at the level of senior officials on EPAs, more than a decade after negotiations began. A final meeting to officially endorse the deal as it stands is foreseen in Brussels for early February. It will then have to be endorsed by West African Heads of State."  

While similar reports in the past were premature, there is strong evidence that this may be correct since in late December, trade and development ministers of five EU member states called on the EC to show more flexibility in EPA negotiations with ACP countries. 

ECOWAS must be complimented on gaining a number of important concessions from the EU. Instead of getting 80% of trade liberalization between the EU and ECOWAS over the next 15 years, the burgeoning agreement focuses on a 75% figure over a 20-year period. The EU has also agreed to stop all export subsidies to West African countries. 

Nonetheless, while details are not readily available, the one thing is clear: The ECOWAS – EU EPA in its current form is a threat to the renewal or even enhancement of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). In the first place, the paradox inter alia was spelled out in USTR Michael Froman’s speech at the AGOA Forum in Addis this past August. Speaking simply, Ambassador Froman suggested that as they worked on renewing AGOA, the U.S. government as a whole did not want American firms to be put at a competitive disadvantage in ‘the rapidly growing and dynamic African market.’ Froman reiterated this sentiment in his September 30, 2013 charge to the United States International Trade Commission.

He specifically requested a study into EPAs - seeking to investigate the agreements and their impact on current or potential reciprocal trade agreements between sub-Saharan African and non-sub-Saharan African partners. For its part, the USITC will specifically investigate and identify those American sectors or products impacted or potentially impacted by EPAs, including any tariff differentials.

But perhaps the greatest complication this ECOWAS-EU EPA could generate is on the approval of the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the European Union. Simply, even if the Europeans were justified in fearing a loss of market share to the Chinese and other countries, the mega deal they were negotiating with the United States could be in jeopardy. With Congress already skittish about the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and TTIP, this EPA could present conditions to scuttle something an agreement worth more than $200 billion annually.  

First, it may not sit well with the Congress if it emerges that the European Union has gained advantages that ensure that Africa can provide preferences to others, and thus, discriminate against U.S. exporters. Secondly, because the United States is on record for supporting regional integration, this EPA may be viewed as a serious obstacle to continental integration. Additionally, the MFN clause of this EPA presents another impediment to American efforts to negotiate a free trade agreement with sub Saharan Africa in a post AGOA period. The clause insists that that any concession given to the U.S. currently not available to the EU must be automatically provided to the EU. This was the main reason the U.S. was unable to negotiate an FTA with South Africa and its partner countries in the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) a decade ago.

Back to the TTIP, while it is true that the U.S. stands to benefit from trade with the EU, the simple fact is that the EU needs this deal even more. With the U.S. economy well on its way to economic recovery – growing at a robust 3.2% - the additional growth .3 of one percent of GNP as a result of the agreement is positive but not that crucial. To Europe, this agreement is estimated to grow GNP by .75 percent of one percent, or two and one half times the positive contribution the U.S. will garner. Thus, it does not help that Congress is already skittish about anything that is seen to disfavor the U.S.

Nonetheless, there are, perhaps, a few palliative measures to address these issues: For instance, if there was flexibility in allowing whatever concessions are agreed upon to be adjusted; if Africa was given respite to develop its building bloc approach to FTAs and customs unions on a continental basis, the EPA may be seen more developmental than it is right now. Secondly, a real premium should be placed on the EU negotiating with the Tripartite Arrangement of COMESA, the EAC and SADC. As with ECOWAS, the EU can agree to wait until integration goals are achieved for such negotiations to take place.

This could be palatable to the U.S. and the East and Southern Africans who have, thus far, resisted the EU. Penultimately, timing is important. Any concession detrimental to the U.S. manufacturer ought to be back loaded - allowing the 10 to 15-year renewal of AGOA to play its role before these can be fully implemented. Lastly, with more details emerging on the MFN clause, it must have sufficient flexibility in allowing the U.S. to negotiate agreements unimpeded by EU demands. Reiterating an earlier point, the 20-year phase in period should be designed to allow for a non-reciprocal AGOA to renewed for a 15-year period by not phasing in earlier concessions which directly harm U.S. exports to Africa.   

Ultimately, if this agreement is signed without palliative measures to address U.S. concerns and its impact on regional integration, the EU may as well bid farewell to a deal with an ebullient American economy, and it will have made the already challenging role of the African Union in regional integration even more arduous.

By Stephen Lande and Dennis Matanda from Manchester Trade

 

Related News

Sourcing Journal: An uncertain future for AGOA?

Sourcing Journal: An uncertain future for AGOA?

Sub-Saharan Africa has both been the land of sourcing opportunity and the land where trade was most likely to remain close to status quo amid other potential adjustments to U.S. agreements. Now, the U.S. may be set to take a closer look at the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which affords eligible African countries duty free sourcing to the U.S. AGOA was renewed...

20 June, 2017
Nigeria: AGOA a vital boost for Aba leather, garment cluster

Nigeria: AGOA a vital boost for Aba leather, garment cluster

In a bid to enhance the industrial value of manufacturers in Abia State, Fidelity Bank, in collaboration with the Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC) and Ghana-based West African Trade and Investment (WATI) hub recently held a capacity building workshop on the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) to sensitise the Aba leather and garment cluster on essential...

27 April, 2017
Nigeria: Experts canvass measures to boost non-oil export through AGOA

Nigeria: Experts canvass measures to boost non-oil export through AGOA

Nigeria’s current economic situation, particularly the disparity between naira and U.S. dollar present huge opportunities that must force government and stakeholders to boost non-oil exportation through  the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), experts have said. The experts spoke on Tuesday, at a training organised in Lagos by the Nigerian-American...

06 April, 2017
Liberia: AGOA to help local entrepreneurs enter US market

Liberia: AGOA to help local entrepreneurs enter US market

A one-day informational session on the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which aimed to help local entrepreneurs enter the United States market with value-added products, has ended in Monrovia. The forum, which brought together over 50 entrepreneurs in agriculture and business, was organized by the Liberia Chamber of Commerce (LCC) and Building Markets in...

27 January, 2017
Sierra Leone: Local producers trained on AGOA trade benefits

Sierra Leone: Local producers trained on AGOA trade benefits

The Sierra Leone Investment and Export Promotion Agency (SLIEPA) in collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the West Africa Trade and Investment Hub yesterday organized a one day sensitization workshop for executives of local companies at the Hub Hotel Wilberforce in Freetown. Sharka Kawa Export Development Officer of SLIEPA...

25 January, 2017
Cooperating, not competing, in Africa: a case for Transatlantic rapprochement

Cooperating, not competing, in Africa: a case for Transatlantic rapprochement

With the African Growth & Opportunity Act (AGOA) Forum ending in Washington this week and the European Parliament approving further trade agreements with six African states earlier this month, the apparent race for African trade continues to intensify. This is no great surprise given the GDP of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is expected to grow 30 percent faster than the rest...

07 October, 2016