- African Growth and Opportunity Act
TRALAC - Trade Law Centre
You are here: Home/News/Article/AGOA rules: The intended and unintended consequences of special fabric provisions

AGOA rules: The intended and unintended consequences of special fabric provisions

AGOA rules: The intended and unintended consequences of special fabric provisions
Lawrence Edwards
Published date:
Wednesday, 20 November 2013
Lawrence Edwards, Robert Lawrence

Preferential import policies that allow developing markets to export to advanced economies are intended to dynamically promote development rather than just provide basic gains from trade. This column argues that the Africa Growth and Opportunities Act achieves the latter but not the former, distorting incentives along the value-added chain. While beneficial, preferential trade deals are not a panacea and are certainly not a replacement for pro-development policies.

The US and EU often claim credit for granting duty-free quota-free access to products from the least developed countries. Such preferential treatment is of interest not only because it might provide one-time benefits in the form of higher incomes and increased employment, but also because trade is often associated with dynamic benefits that lead to faster growth and development. By providing preferential access to developed economies, it is hoped that poor countries will ‘learn by doing;’ that they will over time upgrade their product sophistication, diversify into other products and markets, and ultimately become competitors no longer in need of preferential treatment.

Whether developed markets are actually open to manufactured exports from the least developed economies is unclear. Some preference programs are disingenuous because they include rules of origin that require more local production than these poor countries are capable of. In the case of preference programs in apparel, these rules are particularly stringent, sometimes requiring that at least two (in the case of the EU) or even three (in the case of the US) transformation processes (e.g. yarn, fabric, assembly) in the preference-receiving or granting countries to qualify for duty-free entry. Despite having preferential access, therefore, developing countries often fail to export.

The Africa Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA) which gave sub-Saharan countries duty-free quota-free access to the US is the exception that proves the rule. It highlights the importance of rules of origin. AGOA contained an unusual and generous waiver for wearing apparel that was granted to ‘Lesser Developed Beneficiary Countries’ (LDBCs). The waiver allowed these LDBC countries to use third-country fabrics or yarn and still export clothing under the AGOA preferences. All that was needed was an inspection by US officials that certified that real production was taking place.

The results were impressive. In 2004, just three years after Lesotho became eligible for preferences under AGOA, clothing exports to the US from one of Africa’s poorest land-locked nations had trebled to $460 million, providing employment for over 50,000 workers. Exports from other African countries such as Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Swaziland and others also increased dramatically.

The rule clearly matters. As shown in Figure 1, almost all AGOA apparel exports enter the US under the lesser developed country provision.



This finding has broader implications. In their Vox column, de Melo and Portugal-Perez (2012) indicate that the gains from rich nations applying more relaxed rules on imported inputs are six times greater than the simple act of removing tariffs. Frazer and Van Biesebroeck (2010) and Edwards and Lawrence (2010) similarly find large export responses to the more relaxed rules of origin, although Rotunno, Vézina and Wang (2012) argue that much of this growth was simply the transshipment of apparel from China to the US via Africa.

Despite this impressive growth in export volumes, there is more disquieting evidence in AGOA’s performance that relates to the issue of dynamic benefits. After 12 years of AGOA support, beneficiary countries still do not appear to have viable internationally competitive industries that could survive without the preferences, or to have diversified horizontally into new products and markets or vertically into greater domestic value addition.

Factories in Lesotho, for example, continue to concentrate on just a narrow range of garments: the most basic low unit value categories of knitted tee-shirts, slacks, blouses and blue-jeans. The slice of the production chain they participate in is narrow and does not seem to be expanding. Most apparel manufacturing in Lesotho remains CMT (Cut-Make-Trim). The firms, almost entirely foreign owned, typically provide assembly, packaging and shipping services and depend on their Asian headquarters to generate orders, design the clothes and send them the fabric they need. Productivity levels remain low and worker skills do not appear to have increased over time (Morris 2006). Most of the value is thus added to other parts of the value chain that is located in other countries.

The combination of a productivity disadvantage and almost no domestic textile industry makes the industry’s survival totally dependent on the preferential treatment. Each time the expiration of the special rule has drawn near, studies have issued credible and dire warnings about the industry’s ability to survive without them. This was recently evident in the successful lobbying for the extension of the special rule deadline from September 2012 to September 2015. Clearly there has been trade, but no development.

Why this disappointment? One explanation is that these countries are too far from the threshold of global competitiveness for exports to ignite the industrialization process. Another is the weak integration of the foreign factory owners into the local community (Lall 2005). The expiration of the Multi-fiber Arrangement in January 2005 also led to much stronger competition from China and other previously quota constrained countries in those products exported by AGOA beneficiaries.

In our recent paper we argue that a key reason for these outcomes is that preferential import policies combined with the third country fabric rule have powerful incentive effects that can distort production decisions (Edwards and Lawrence 2010). We show that the implicit subsidy of the preference is greatest for products with very low value addition and thus at the margin, the tax on adding additional value can be very high. For example, the 17% preference margin granted by AGOA through MFN tariff relief on clothing is equivalent to a 34% effective subsidy for products where value addition makes up 50% of total costs, but 85% for products where value addition is only 20% of total costs. This allows AGOA producers to offset cost disadvantages due to the lower productivity of their workers and greater distance from suppliers and markets and helps explain why the initial responses to AGOA were so powerful.

At the same time as they encourage exports of low value-added products, the preferential policies have two deleterious effects.

  • On the one hand, the incentives are most powerful in lower quality products that require less value-addition.

This limits the dynamic benefits that are hoped for from these preferences by discouraging skills development and other forms of quality upgrading.

  • On the other hand it encourages the use of more expensive imported fabrics rather than the cheaper fabrics that are more likely to be produced in poor countries.

This makes it less likely that there will be backward linkages into domestic textile industries that are still at rudimentary stages of development.

The experience of AGOA underscores the importance of distinguishing between trade and development. Trade preferences do have major advantages.

  • First, they can offer powerful inducements to beneficiary exporters that are financed through foregone tariff revenues by developed countries rather than taxpayers in developing countries.
  • Second, by providing a form of infant industry protection in export rather than domestic markets, they ensure that products have to meet the requirements of consumers in advanced economies.
  • Third, since they are externally imposed, they do not give rise to domestic rent-seeking.

The experience also shows that preferential trade deals are not a panacea and certainly not a substitute for other development policies.

The special third country fabric provision rule distorts decisions on value-addition and fabric use in opposite directions, both of which are undesirable and discourage the dynamic benefits expected from these preferences. Preferential import policies can perhaps complement rather than substitute for more comprehensive industrial strategies that involve complementary domestic policies to improve private and governmental capabilities. This does not mean that these preferential rules are unimportant, but suggests they are likely insufficient.

Lawrence Edwards is Associate Professor in the School of Economics, University of Cape Town, and Robert Z. Lawrence is Professor of International Trade and Investment, John F Kennedy School of Government Harvard University, Senior Fellow, Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics, and a former member of of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors under President Clinton.

Read related news articles

US Senator Chris Coons proposes AGOA extension by 16 years, immediate review of SA’s AGOA eligibility

Powerful US Democratic Party Senator Chris Coons is circulating a discussion draft of a Bill to renew the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) for 16 years that would also require an immediate “out-of-cycle” review of South Africa’s eligibility for Agoa. That could lead to South Africa being removed next year from the programme, which has provided considerable benefits to SA exporters to the US of cars, fruits and wine, in...

07 November 2023

AGOA boosts Kenya's textile exports to US, sector sees 7.2% growth

The African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) has benefitted Kenya’s textile and apparel sector, leading to monthly exports to the tune of Sh4.5 billion, or Sh150 million per day, last year, according to a study by London-based Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA). The programme has had a positive impact on the country’s export-processing zones (EPZs), especially in the textile and garment sector. Kenya is the second-largest exporter of...

08 August 2023

US fashion brands urge early renewal of AGOA

US fashion companies are calling for the early renewal of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a trade program that allows thousands of African products to enter the United States duty-free. They argue that a longer-term arrangement would not only benefit African economies but also boost investment in the region. The AGOA was first enacted in 2000 and is currently set to expire in 2025. However, US officials have indicated that the...

31 July 2023

US boosts Kenya apparel industry with $55m in new trade deals

The US is giving Kenya $55 million for expansion of export processing zones in a move that will boost Nairobi’s apparel exports. US initiative Prosper Africa and the US Embassy announced the funding at the launch of the US-Kenya Business Roadshow held on April 25 in New York. The announcement was part of the commitments made by President Joe Biden at the US-Africa Leaders’ Summit last year. The funds will be channelled under USAid and...

29 April 2023

Nigeria: Garment factory to create 2,000 direct jobs, utilize AGOA

Kwara State Governor, AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, at the weekend, said the state’s garment factory will be inaugurated this year with a take off capacity to hire 2,000 direct labour. Speaking with dozens of APC youths, progressive social media influencers, and some online news publishers on Saturday, the governor said the idea is to make Kwara a hub for garment production, which can then benefit from the African Growth and Opportunity Act...

26 August 2022

AAFA: Africa ‘logical’ choice for brands fleeing China

The American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA) urged the office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to renew the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), as U.S. brands and retailers look to diversify sourcing. While the trade agreement’s expiration is still three years away, the Washington, D.C.-based trade group believes that establishing long-term, forward-looking policy will help brands commit to new sourcing...

29 June 2022

Kenyan textile company eyes export market through new Zanzibar facility

A Kenyan company is setting up a $51.3 million (about Sh115 billion) factory in Zanzibar as it targets to get a pie of the world’s $920 billion textile market. The global textile industry was estimated at around $920 billion in 2018, and it was projected to reach approximately $1,230 billion by 2024, available global data show. With its $51.3 million factory at Chunguni area in Zanzibar, Basra Textiles Limited is specifically targeting...

12 January 2022

Ethiopia’s economy hit as major clothing maker closes shop

Ethiopia’s once rapidly growing economy is taking another hit tied to its yearlong war, with global clothing manufacturer PVH Corp. saying it is closing its facility there because of the “speed and volatility of the escalating situation.” PVH, whose brands include Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, has been a marquee occupant of Ethiopia’s model industrial park in the city of Hawassa, where Africa’s second-most populous country has...

19 November 2021

Togo's textile focused SEZ aims to create value-added textile supply chain

Togo’s ‘PIA’, a textile focussed SEZ, aims to create an eco-system for textile value chains and offer multiple incentives to foreign investors investing in the Textile Park.  A West African nation ‘Togo’ recently established the Adétikopé Industrial Platform (PIA), a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) conceptualised by ARISE IIP, to unlock the growth potential and promote the industrialisation of Togo. Located along the strategic...

05 October 2021

'Changing jeans sourcing scene has these countries coming up roses'

The sourcing landscape for denim jeans is slowly but certainly shifting, while overall U.S. blue denim apparel imports continue to decline. Imports of jeans fell 7.43 percent in the first two months of the year compared to the same period in 2020 to a value of $460.25 million, expanding on a 5.36 percent year-over-year falloff in January, according to the Commerce Department’s Office of Textiles & Apparel (OTEXA). Coming off...

09 April 2021

Lesotho: '45,000 textile jobs at severe risk'

With only about a week left, the United States government says it is "disheartened" by Lesotho's failure to address its human trafficking concerns. This puts the country on the brink, with the real risk of losing billions of maloti in funding under the second compact and about 45 000 textiles jobs facing serious jeopardy. The US had given Prime Minister Moeketsi Majoro's government a 1 February 2021 deadline to address an array of human...

28 January 2021

You are here: Home/News/Article/AGOA rules: The intended and unintended consequences of special fabric provisions